From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16910 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 19:07:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16903 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 19:07:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 19:07:31 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BA53E77; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:07:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D94AC72.3020704@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:07:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz , Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy'' References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com> <20020927182200.GA16046@nevyn.them.org> <15764.42249.38594.693286@localhost.redhat.com> <1020927185903.ZM24287@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 > On Sep 27, 2:35pm, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > >> > I think dummy-frame works well. >> >> infcall.[ch] ? (which goes with infcmd.c) For hand_function_call() et.al. (which I can never find 'cos it is hidden in valops.c)? Ok. For dummy-frame.[ch] I'm thinking of just the ``struct dummy_frame'' object code found in blockframe.c. > I like this one. > > I don't mind dummy-frame.[hc] either, but it's not 8.3 compliant. It's ok. It will be reduced to: dummy-fr.[ch]. Andrew