From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-10638-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12170 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 18:20:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12163 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 18:20:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 18:20:31 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DEE173D39; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:20:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:20:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00481.txt.bz2

>> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:47:11 -0400
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>> 
>> I'd like to float the idea of moving all the generic dummy frame code 
>> into a new file dummy.[hc].
> 
> 
> Yes, but I'd suggest to call the files something other than dummy.*,
> lest someone thinks they are junk ;-)

But then I can't have a function called ``dummy_spit()'' (OZ? expression 
for blowing one's fuse).

More seriously, I'm struggling for a better name: ``generic'' ``gdf'' 
``dummy-frame'', ...  I guess the last one?

Andrew