From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8038 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2002 21:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8031 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2002 21:02:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 21:02:29 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE373D1E; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:02:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D922460.90209@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:02:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni Cc: David Carlton , gdb Subject: Re: the global symbol table References: <15762.8708.250726.680566@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2 > > * So just what's going on with the usage of minimal symbols in > > lookup_symbol? Are there any situations where looking in the > > minimal symbol is actually helpful? If so, do those only have to do > > with ickiness related to mangled names, or is there a more serious > > issue that I'm missing? > > > > debugging something compiled w/o -g. > Assembly only debugging can also be very tricky. Yes, see nodebug.exp. Andrew