From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1736 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2002 00:26:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1726 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2002 00:26:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2002 00:26:22 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C51B8831; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:26:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D8281E4.1060400@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:26:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat Canada User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020607 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: DejaGNU KFAILs References: <3D8254C1.3020101@redhat.com> <3D82743A.5060106@ges.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: >> I've merged the DejaGNU KFAIL code into the repository. Let's wait a >> little bit for the GCC folks to say everything is OK (they should not >> be affected, but waiting a couple of days won't hurt). > > > Ya!!!! > > I think, on the GDB front, the first thing to do is pull any existing > prms_id or ..._id lines as none of them apply to the current database. > Sure. > The other thing to consider is pulling all the existing xfails .... > I was thinking the same thing... -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9