From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5810 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2002 03:49:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5803 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 03:49:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 03:49:15 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAEB3F43; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:49:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D7D6BB7.30403@ges.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 20:49:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Fedor Cc: Jason Molenda , gdb Subject: Re: Apple's Objective-C language patch References: <3D7D0186.8020103@doc.com> <20020909173318.A50843@molenda.com> <3D7D6762.2010300@doc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 > Jason Molenda wrote: > > What is the history behind objc-exp.y? Is this from the old > gnustep-gdb patch that'd been floating around since the mid-90's > (the one that Michael Snyder wrote while at NeXT)? The Apple > sources have the ObjC support rolled in c-exp.y; it doesn't seem > unreasonable given the overlap between the two expression syntaxes. > > > I got everything, including objc-exp.y from the 'recent' Apple patch. I haven't looked at the latest Apple sources - I didn't know if I should do that since Andrew Cagney told me to work from the patch, but perhaps I misunderstood. Yes, I would have requested this. Believe it or not, very recently added to my things to do today list is to get an answer to the question: can a third party take random Apple/GDB sources and contribute them to the FSF. Andrew