From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-10114-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27648 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2002 05:17:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27639 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 05:17:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO felix.sypra.si) (212.118.92.52)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 05:17:23 -0000
Received: from sysen.si ([10.1.10.15])
	by felix.sypra.si (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA08413
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:15:33 +0200
Message-ID: <3D6C5CC7.5050108@sysen.si>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:17:00 -0000
From: Iztok Kobal <iztok.kobal@sysen.si>
Organization: SYSEN d.d.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020513 Netscape/7.0b1
X-Accept-Language: sl, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problem debugging SOs
References: <3D6603AC.4010607@s5.net> 	<1020823145316.ZM626@localhost.localdomain> 	<3D69F82C.9020109@sysen.si> 	<1020826154249.ZM30715@localhost.localdomain> 	<3D6B10E6.90400@sysen.si> <1020827150400.ZM3420@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2



Kevin Buettner wrote:

>On Aug 27,  7:40am, Iztok Kobal wrote:
>
>  
>
>>code to be debugged was compiled with the gcc-2.95.2 -g3
>>
>>No more problems seem to be directly related to the SO debugging
>>New problem with gdb-5.2.1 is that the <Step Into> (gdb step) behaves as 
>>if it was the <Step Over) (gdb next) even in the simplest (statically 
>>linked single .c) projects.
>>    
>>
>
>Are you certain that the files containing the functions that you're
>trying to step into were compiled with -g ? 
>
The test executable code was compiled using gcc-2.95.2 with the -g3 option.
Using the same test executable code: Steps Into with the gdb-5.0 and 
gdb-5.1.0.1 but not with gdb-5.2 or gdb-5.2.1.

All gdb executables were generated and installed the same way on the 
same machine/enviroment for the same platform (i686-pc-linux-gnu).

If you are interested, I can send you all execs and needed sources in 
concern, as they are.

> The only time I see the
>behavior you describe is when I've forgotten to use -g.
>
True, yet I have not forgotten ...

>
>Kevin
>
>  
>
Iztok

>  
>