From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28734 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2002 03:08:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28721 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 03:08:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 03:08:42 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20323E39; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:08:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D6C3EA1.4090603@ges.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:08:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John S. Yates, Jr." Cc: gdb Subject: Re: mapping addresses References: <005d01c24790$354b1150$1400a8c0@astral> <3D615380.2070003@ges.redhat.com> <024d01c249f9$9368d2c0$1400a8c0@astral> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 > A week ago it looked like our kernel was heading off > into rather unexplored design space. Since then we > have simplified things greatly. We are now planning > a much more traditional scheme in which the kernel > executes in a single flat logical address space. > > I am sure that gdb has been used to debug these sorts > of systems many times in the past. Is there any kind > of support for logical versus physical addressing? It's limited. The d10v talks physical addresses across the remote protocol while, internally, GDB still talks logical. Look for ``translate'' in the d10v code. Andrew