From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-9942-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17292 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2002 05:54:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17274 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2002 05:54:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2002 05:54:18 -0000
Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4234F3ED1; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 01:54:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D5F3685.4070807@ges.redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 22:54:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rick Richardson <rickr@mn.rr.com>
Cc: GDB Mailing List <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gdb retargetting
References: <20020814110514.A28654@mn.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2

> What gives?  I'm beginning to suspect that nobody compiles the
> snapshots on the GNU ftp site.  Should I have started from some other
> snapshots?  I'm completely learing of basing off of "the tip" of the
> CVS tree, as I have no idea when that is stable.  So I thought basing
> off of the GNU snapshots would be the way to go.

The head of a combined GDB and BINUTILS tree is stable.  In fact, for a 
new port, it is probably the best option.

enjoy,
Andrew