From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Register Groups (again)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 16:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D5EE0C6.7080902@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
See: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-02/msg00268.html for the
origins of this idea.
I'd like to propose a new object ``struct reggroup'' and a number of
methods:
struct reggroup; // the opaque object
// Some predefined register groups
struct reggroup *general_reggroup;
struct reggroup *float_reggroup;
struct reggroup *system_reggroup;
struct reggroup *vector_reggroup;
struct reggroup *all_reggroup;
// architecture method indicating membership of a register group
int register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, regnum, reggroup);
// The reggroup's attributes
const char *reggroup_name (reggroup);
// Null terminated list of the architectures reggroups
struct reggroup **reggroups (gdbarch);
// Add a custom register group to an architecture
struct reggroup *reggroup_add (gdbarch, name, other attributes?);
A default register group function could look something like:
if all group
return 1
if float group and register's type is float
return 1;
if vector group and register's type is vector
return 1;
if general group and register's type isn't float or vector
return 1
return 0
And the ``info registers', ``info float'', ``info all-registers'' and
``info vector'' (``info system''?) commands would then use it.
The big gapeing holes in this proposal are:
- an MI/GUI interface.
The above interface provides:
for (regnum = 0; regnum < NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS; regnum++)
if (register_reggroup_p (arch, regnum, XXXX_group)
....
I guess that would be abstracted somehow. Somebody elses problem though :-)
- how it relates to frames
It currently assumes that the register groups are identical between
frames :-/
comments, thoughts?
Andrew
PS: I guess this gets written up and goes into the ``Registers'' chapter.
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-17 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-17 16:48 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-08-17 21:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-17 22:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-18 7:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-18 8:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-18 9:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-19 11:54 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-19 18:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-20 19:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-19 11:35 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D5EE0C6.7080902@ges.redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox