From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8471 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2002 16:20:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8455 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 16:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 16:19:57 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463373CFC; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:19:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D57E028.8030809@ges.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , jorma.laaksonen@hut.fi, gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() and remote debugging References: <20020806100634.11483.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20020806132047.GA16450@nevyn.them.org> <1020809231206.ZM11775@localhost.localdomain> <20020812032527.GA3838@nevyn.them.org> <3D57C611.4010403@ges.redhat.com> <20020812143803.GA25086@nevyn.them.org> <3D57CF1A.4070405@ges.redhat.com> <1020812154849.ZM31876@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 > At the moment, I like the first approach better because it's simpler. > I'd prefer that we wait on the more complicated approach until a need > is demonstrated for the additional complexity. > > >> Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier. > > > Do we already have such a test? Well, looking at some finally dead hacks, .... int remote_Z_write_wp_packet_supported_p (void) { struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state (); /* Don't even think about it if the remote target isn't selected. */ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-19: This shouldn't be necessary - the WATCHPOINT methods should be in the target vector. Ulgh! */ if (target_shortname == NULL || strcmp (target_shortname, "remote") != 0) return 0; notice that the problem it was trying to avoid was with ``target sim''. So in the above the question is no longer local/remote but local VS remote VS sim VS .... Andrew