From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29743 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 15:05:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29736 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 15:05:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 15:05:26 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AC83F6A; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:05:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D5288B5.5080906@ges.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 08:05:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020802 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbserver/ChangeLog? References: <3D527C82.1040500@ges.redhat.com> <20020808141557.GA4426@nevyn.them.org> <3D527EB3.3020704@ges.redhat.com> <20020808142828.GA4893@nevyn.them.org> <3D528190.9080706@ges.redhat.com> <20020808143742.GA5362@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 > Hmm, a better starting point would be date the last branch was cut >> (which reminds me, the release process doesn't stamp the changelog when >> that is done ...). Otherwize a diff of the changelogs between two >> releases won't make much sense -> it will contain a lot of noise. > > > Yeah, you're right. >> The other more pragmatic aproach is to start it today, in 4 months, the >> problem will go away anyway. > > > There've been significant changes since the 5.2 release; I'd rather do > it from there. M'kay by me. Andrew