From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31797 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2002 14:22:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31790 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2002 14:22:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2002 14:22:44 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67323F6A; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:22:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D527EB3.3020704@ges.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 07:22:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020802 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbserver/ChangeLog? References: <3D527C82.1040500@ges.redhat.com> <20020808141557.GA4426@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 > On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:13:22AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Daniel, >> >> Should there be a gdbserver/ChangeLog? I was recently doing some code >> archology and was finding that the presence of gdbserver entries in >> gdb/ChangeLog was making things mighty confusing. Often the same >> function/variable appears but in a totally different context. > > > Hmm, I think that's a good idea. Is it worth moving entries from the > old ChangeLogs, or just starting a new one for future changes? The ``rewriting history'' problem. I don't know. I'm tempted with suggesting that entries in this years changelog being moved but I don't know how independant they are. Andrew