From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24760 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2002 21:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24751 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 21:49:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 21:49:28 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA21807; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D416E4A.6262CD6E@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:49:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat Canada X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: "William A. Gatliff" , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: "tbreak" and "commands" commands... References: <20020726185406.GG10000@gnat.com> <20020726140130.A15935@saturn.billgatliff.com> <20020726203114.GI10000@gnat.com> <3D415F90.BE61E0BD@redhat.com> <20020726211926.GK10000@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > It seems that there we don't know of any reason at the moment why > commands could not work with temporary breakpoints. So I will see if I > can fix that. If it turns out to be too complicated, then we can change > GDB to refuse commands with temporary breakpoints. Does it sound > reasonable? > It certainly does. Thank you for the report and for looking into fixing it. Regards, Fernando