From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-9676-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22772 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2002 18:49:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22765 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 18:49:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2002 18:49:48 -0000
Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE0633DBF; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:49:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D3EF6CB.5080300@ges.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:49:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: why cgen/cpu and not cgen in gdb_5_2_1-2002-07-23-release
References: <200207241732.KAA00372@casey.transmeta.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2

> I just checked out gdb_5_2_1-2002-07-23-release from the cvs tree.
> 
> Question: Why are the cgen cpu files there but not cgen?

Same reason GDB doesn't include autoconf, automake, gettext, bison, and 
many other tools used to create generated files.  Not needed.

Andrew