From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22005 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2002 16:38:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21995 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2002 16:38:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2002 16:38:23 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDE43CB2; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:38:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D20857C.7060506@ges.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 09:38:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020613 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Namespaces; Was: getting rid of the target stack References: <20020627052529.GA15598@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 >> (and, hey, whatever happened to the namespace work we were discussing >> earlier?) > > > It's on my schedule somewhere after thread-local storage and Dwarf 2 > duplicate removal. I don't remember the dates too well, but I think > that means I'll be able to start pitching in in Sept/Oct. Hmm, of all the new features GDB needs, the ability to handle namespace support, would have to be top of the list. The bug database is littered with PRs related to this. So things are really clear, I take it that while people have floated some interesting ideas, no one is working on this. Remember, we need to be very careful to not give the impression that this task is under control (it isn't) and someone is already doing the work (the oposite is the truth - we need someone to step forward and do their ``worst'' :-). enjoy, Andrew