From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6597 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2002 19:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6588 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2002 19:33:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2002 19:33:29 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2381C3CB9; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D18C588.8070007@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:33:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020613 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: tromey@redhat.com, Gdb List Subject: Re: Proposal for gettextizing References: <873cvbfegq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <3D18B80B.2090003@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 > Andrew suggested posting this here. > > Once a few gettext patches have gone in, I'd like to have pure > string-wrapping patches (those that don't change the logic of the code > in any other way) be considered obvious, so that I can just check them > in. I'll continue to submit other patches as usual. > > Comments? Objections? > > Sounds like a good move. One PS thought. Post it as an RFC and give it a day or so. That way someone, anyone, can eyeball the changes and check for minor slipups. Andrew