From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28129 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2002 13:39:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28119 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2002 13:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos.suse.cz) (195.47.106.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2002 13:39:32 -0000 Received: from chimera.suse.cz (chimera.suse.cz [10.20.0.2]) by kerberos.suse.cz (SuSE SMTP server) with ESMTP id 2D70359D34C; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:39:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from suse.cz (naga.suse.cz [10.20.1.16]) by chimera.suse.cz (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id g5ODdUg23527; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:39:30 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: chimera.suse.cz: Host naga.suse.cz [10.20.1.16] claimed to be suse.cz Message-ID: <3D172112.1050108@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 06:39:00 -0000 From: Michal Ludvig Organization: SuSE CR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb Cc: Mark Kettenis Subject: dwarf2 unwinding for i386 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 Hi all, what do you think about adding dwarf2 unwinding (dwarf2cfi.c) to i386 target? On x86-64 we are already using it for some time now and it seems to be quite stable. GCC folks are about to switch omit-frame-pointer on by default for i386 in a near future, but are waiting (as I understand it) for GDB to implement dwarf2 unwinding, so that the resulting code could be debugged. Can we make at least a testing branch with this support? Opinions? MarkK? Michal Ludvig -- * SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz * +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz