From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-9291-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13994 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2002 00:53:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13986 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2002 00:53:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2002 00:53:51 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9BDB23F0A; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:53:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D151C1B.8030805@cygnus.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:53:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020613
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GCC vs ISO C 90 ...
References: <3D1511F4.2090403@cygnus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/msg00871.html
And the original thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/msg00337.html

Anyway, GCC is effectively still stuck in the 70's :-)

Andrew