From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28692 invoked by alias); 15 May 2002 14:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28666 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 14:13:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 14:13:35 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72773D61; Wed, 15 May 2002 10:13:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CE26D0E.4010401@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 07:13:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: thorpej@wasabisystems.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Saving/restoring the entire register set References: <200205151008.LAA27449@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 > Hmm, the patch in that file is missing the contents of regbuf.[ch], so I > can't try it, even if I wanted :-( Oops. Watch for a reply with everything >> For the record (per numerious change requests) {read,write} register >> bytes need to be snuffed out. > > > Yes please... More importantly, that one is ``moving forward''. > How about creating a "regbuf" branch where we can play with these ideas a > little more without the risk of destabilizing everything? That way we > don't keep having to wait a week for each change to go in. Hmm, ....! Andrew