From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Towards truly multi-arching the i386
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 20:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CDF328E.5000100@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205122204.g4CM4HU27541@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
> The i386 has been partially multi-arch'ed for some time now, but only
> the bare minimum has been done. Therefore I decided to put some real
> effort into it. I think I've tackled most of the difficulties, and
> made some real progress. Unfortunately there are quite a number of
> old targets that I'd really like to drop in this process. I made some
> lists with targets: targets that are already working satisfactory,
> targets that I intend to support (possibly with the help of others),
> one target that's really redundant, and a few targets that I'd like to
> obsolete. Please take a good look at that last look, and yell at me
> if you can think of a reason not to obsolete any of those targets. If
> I don't hear anything within the next few weeks they will be lost
> forever :-).
See:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_15.html#SEC117
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_15.html#SEC153
> Mark
>
> Supported targets
> -----------------
>
> i386-*-aout*
> i386-*-coff*
> i386-*-elf*
These three should be identical.
> i386-*-freebsd*
> i386-*-linux*
> i386-*-msdosdjgpp*
> i386-*-netbsdelf*
> i386-*-netbsd*
> i386-*-netware*
Can this go? I think it is the old old Novell thing.
> i386-*-openbsd*
> i386-*-pe*
ChrisF would like the PE deleted! It's been bug reported.
> i386-*-solaris* Canonicalized to i386-pc-solaris2
> i386-*-sysv4*
> i386-*-vxworks*
>
> To be supported
> ---------------
>
> i386-*-cygwin*
> i386-*-isc* Issue with START_INFERIOR_TRAPS_EXPECTED
What is this machine?
> i386-*-lynxos*
I think this can go (or at least an attempt made).
> i386-*-sco3.2v5* Several issues
> i386-*-sco* Issue with START_INFERIOR_TRAPS_EXPECTED
> i386-*-sysv4.2* UNIXWARE define, ptid issues
> i386-*-sysv5* UNIXWARE define, ptid issues
> i386-*-sysv* Issue with START_INFERIOR_TRAPS_EXPECTED
>
> Redundant targets
> -----------------
> i386-ncr-* Caught by i386-*-sysv4*
>
> Obsolete targets
> ----------------
>
> i386-sequent-bsd*
> i386-sequent-sysv4*
> i386-sequent-sysv*
> i386-*-aix*
> i386-*-bsd*
> i386-*-mach3*
> i386-*-os9k
Obsoleting os9kread is on the to do list as well.
> i386-*-osf1mk*
> i386-*-sco3.2v4* Broken
Have fun!
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-13 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-12 15:04 Mark Kettenis
2002-05-12 20:27 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-05-25 18:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-05-28 18:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-12 22:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-05-12 22:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CDF328E.5000100@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox