From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16676 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 23:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16657 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 23:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 23:50:27 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B213DB9; Thu, 9 May 2002 19:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CDB0B49.3040700@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 16:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Joern Rennecke , binutils@sources.redhat.com, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, bje@redhat.com Subject: Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface - include/elf/sh.h ? References: <3CCED903.294513BE@st.com> <15568.36275.110744.510692@localhost.redhat.com> <3CD12BF8.7E1650C1@st.com> <3CD7EB51.7816DD1@st.com> <3CD803BC.5060900@cygnus.com> <3CD823D1.FC1E3717@st.com> <3CD85192.7020100@cygnus.com> <3CDAEDA4.3DE4A2D5@st.com> <15578.63785.429521.553723@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 > I think include/gcc-sh64.h or include/gdb-sh64.h could be OK. Would match the > include/sim-sh64.h file. BTW, GDB has started moving the include/sim-*.h files into include/gdb/sim-*.h, but otherwise, yes. Andrew