From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18653 invoked by alias); 3 May 2002 03:43:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18646 invoked from network); 3 May 2002 03:43:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com) (66.185.95.102) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2002 03:43:13 -0000 Received: from ca.ibm.com ([24.114.136.74]) by fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with ESMTP id <20020503034312.XXKI216840.fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@ca.ibm.com> for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 23:43:12 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD207A5.1090103@ca.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:43:00 -0000 From: Brian Thomson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Target Output Streaming in MI References: <20020502211946.GA25969@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.114.136.74] using ID at Thu, 2 May 2002 23:43:12 -0400 X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > IMVHO, the best thing to do for native would be to have MI traffic on a > separate file descriptor than the inferior's stdin/out/err. > Could the external MI client pass the fd # on the command line? Are there host platforms where an fd can't be externalized like that? Brian Thomson IBM