From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15561 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2002 03:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15554 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2002 03:20:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2002 03:20:53 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08DD3D0C; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:21:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CBE3B9E.9040108@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H . J . Lu" Cc: Michael Veksler , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 5.2 removes the conditional breakpoints References: <3CB3EF53.80608@il.ibm.com> <20020417165756.A6417@lucon.org> <3CBE14AE.6030805@cygnus.com> <20020417174819.A7195@lucon.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:34:54PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > >> > May I check it into gdb 5.2? > >> >> No. 5,2 is effectivly frozen. I've the README file to fix, that is it. >> > > > It works with gdb 4.17 and someone broke it in 5.x. How long does it > take to fix it? (looks under table, nope, no fire ...) H.J. This ``very bad regression from gdb 4,17'' that must be in 5,2 has been around for ~4 years now without anyone even thinking to report it! Perhaphs it isn't so bad after all :-) BTW, a real .exp testcase? Andrew