From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18229 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2002 16:40:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18222 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2002 16:40:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2002 16:40:03 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FED53C3F; Sun, 14 Apr 2002 12:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CB9B0E4.8050203@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Switch ARM, SPARC and i386 to generic dummy frames (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY)? References: <3CB99778.4050403@cygnus.com> <20020414111854.A4874@nevyn.them.org> <3CB9A15D.8030807@cygnus.com> <20020414115322.A5825@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 > Sorry, you've lost me. BTW, the line: > >> >> - generic: looks for the FP in the list of dummy frames > >> isn't a typo. > > > Certainly. But didn't you say "fix the first one (search for the PC)"? > > My concern is if we have multiple call frames from (to?) the same PC. > That's easy enough to do; I've done it by accident plenty of times. Sorry, you've still lost me. PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY() returns non-zero if the PC is in a ``call dummy'' (any call dummy). Having multiple call dummies at the same address is normal (as with AT_ENTRY). Andrew