From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29352 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 17:32:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29330 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 17:32:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 17:32:44 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0543C90; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:32:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CB325BD.6030003@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 10:32:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Berlin Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: think-o: dwarf2 CFA != frame->frame (x86-64) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 >> See: >> >> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=466 >> > > > Sorry, this is incorrect. > When debug_frame info is present, it is the *only* way used to > retrieve register values. > There is no mixture of methods. > > Even in my case, either the executable contains .debug_frame info, and we > use it for *all* cases, or it doesn't, and we use it for *no* cases. > There is no mixture. > > There will never be a mixture of methods (unless you do something illegal, > like attempt to use the .eh_frame section, which contains stack unwinding > only for routines throwing exceptions) Please re-read what I wrote. Andrew