From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26071 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 17:50:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26064 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2002 17:50:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2002 17:50:19 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145523DD6; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:48:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C9F62F2.9000902@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [maint] sim and common References: <3C85A44B.6090403@cygnus.com> <3C87F2DC.8070205@cygnus.com> <3C9CF23A.5040306@cygnus.com> <20020325101111.A5475@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 > Hi - > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 04:23:06PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Did anyone else have a comment on this thread? >> > >> > I'm wondering if it would be helpful for sim specific maintainers (at >> > least for sim/common based sims) to have implicit approval/write >> > permission on the sim/common directory. >> > [...] > > > Whether it is helpful or not can be ascertained when/if such maintainers > have patches for sim/common, and then if any "hindrance" in fact exists. > Preemptively granting such permission, in the absence of a history/intent > of specific contributions, goes against the grain of the rest of gdb. If I understand the above correctly, your view is that, for the moment, only BenE and yourself should approve changes to src/sim/common? enjoy, Andrew