From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20241 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2002 14:49:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20140 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2002 14:49:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2002 14:49:46 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3FD3DAB; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:49:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C97500A.4050805@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:49:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: @example vs @smallexample? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> > I wonder whether we should add a comment in the manual saying that >> > only @smallexample should be used. > >> >> In a (er @chapter :-) > > > We could make it an @appendix. > > >> that documents the conventions used by the manual? > > > Yes, that sounds like a good place. Perhaps as a footnote (since it's a > minor matter for someone who reads the text, not writes new content). I think it is normally found somewhere towards the end of the first chapter (assuming that chapter is a general intro of the manual). After ``we need free documentation''. Andrew