From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8092-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29052 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2002 02:55:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28958 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2002 02:55:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2002 02:55:45 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (notinuse.cygnus.com [205.180.231.12])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA14212;
	Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:55:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3C96A64C.D86988D3@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:55:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2smp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Martin M. Hunt" <hunt@redhat.com>
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: build_regcache
References: <200203150141.g2F1fO620177@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2

"Martin M. Hunt" wrote:
> 
> Am I misunderstanding something or does it not make sense that the register
> cache is initialized before any architectures?  Would moving it to the end of
> COMMON_OBS be an OK solution?

I think that order of execution of initialize routines cannot be
guaranteed.
Therefore they need to be order independent.