From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10344 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 20:32:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10237 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2002 20:32:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2002 20:32:39 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20533ED3; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:32:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C964EE3.1080100@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:32:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: @example vs @smallexample? References: <3C962464.1000706@cygnus.com> <7458-Mon18Mar2002211046+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:31:16 -0500 >> From: Andrew Cagney >> >> Mind if I try replacing all occurances of @example with @smallexample? > > > Please go ahead. Thanks. > > I wonder whether we should add a comment in the manual saying that > only @smallexample should be used. In a (er @chapter :-) that documents the conventions used by the manual? At present there is a single brief comment about how input/output are presented in the ``sample session'' chapter. People writing new content would hopefully refer to the conventions section (and read these comments) when creating new content. Andrew