From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3845 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 17:31:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3781 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2002 17:31:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2002 17:31:17 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCA33ED3; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:31:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C962464.1000706@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: @example vs @smallexample? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 Mind if I try replacing all occurances of @example with @smallexample? Andrew > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> I'm wondering if the doco be using @example, @smallexample or both? >> For this releasing gdb chapter, I suspect @smallexample is better. > > > IIRC, @smallexample is better, since it does TRT for the @smallbook > format as well as for the normal format. > >