From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16320 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2002 03:14:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16263 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 03:14:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2002 03:14:21 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E413CA9; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 22:14:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C8C210A.9000306@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 19:14:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: branch used for "branch" snapshots References: <20020310115215.A30409@dragon.nuxi.com> <3C8BC93B.5020704@cygnus.com> <20020310184845.A41050@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 > On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 03:59:39PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > The gdb/snapshots/branch/README says that these branch snapshots are cut >> > from the 5.1 branch. Can they be cut from the gdb_5_2-branch now? > >> >> Oops! The readme is out-of-date. Just fixing the doco noteing that >> this needs to be done. > > > The snapshots also had 5.1 in their name, so the snapshot script also > needs tweaking maybe? The snapshot process is working alarmingly well :-) The tradition is to use .90 et.al. suffixes for pre releases of the next version :-) See my recent doco post describing release numbering. enjoy, Andrew