From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27435 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2002 06:31:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27388 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2002 06:31:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2002 06:31:58 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEFE3E65; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 01:31:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C87095D.1080902@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 22:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: New directory src/gdb/misc? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >> > This leaves ``gdb/common'' and, (new suggestion) gdb/misc/ as possible >> > directory names. > >> >> 'misc' doesn't convey any information. It's like calling something >> 'new' in its documentation - not useful for very long. I'd vote for >> common. > > > Either `common' or maybe `lib' (or `gdblib'). I agree that `misc' is not > such a good idea. I suspect lib will end up being confused with gdblib/libgdb. At present I can only see signals.c and a small part of utils.c ending up in their. enjoy, Andrew