From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4504 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2002 05:08:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4434 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 05:08:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 05:08:29 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9293D8E; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 00:08:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C85A44B.6090403@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 21:08:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Clifton , Andrew Cagney , Geoff Keating , Andrew Cagney , Chris Demetriou , Ben Elliston , "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: [maint] sim and common Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 Hello, The sim/MAINTAINERS file contains: > SIM Maintainers > > The simulator is part of the GDB project, so see the file > gdb/MAINTAINERS for general information about maintaining these files. > > If you are considering contributing a patch, please see the file > gdb/CONTRIBUTE. Patches to these files should be posted to: > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > Maintainers for particular sims: > > arm Nick Clifton > ppc Andrew Cagney > ppc Geoff Keating > mips Andrew Cagney > mips Chris Demetriou > common Ben Elliston > common Frank Ch. Eigler > (NickC worded this very well) I'm wondering if it would be helpful for sim specific maintainers (at least for sim/common based sims) to have implicit approval/write permission on the sim/common directory. Which reminds me, Stephane Carrez should really be listed as the m68hc11 maintainer. Unless, that is, GDB is going to assume that a GDB target maintainer implicitly maintains the corresponding SIM. Thoughts? Andrew