From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18397 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2002 14:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18123 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2002 14:21:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2002 14:21:36 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5553CBA; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 09:21:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C84D468.3060108@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 06:21:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rbrown64@csc.com.au Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: HP-UX support in 5.2 - workaround going in? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 > Is Jeff Law and Elena's -Dvfork=fork workaround for HP-UX intended to go in > in 5.2? > It doesn't seem to be in the CVS if it should. > Testing with the 0223 snapshot still hangs on 11.11. > > I know of three configury things: HP-UX fork, HP-UX gcc vs cc -?, AIX and toc. And there are 4.5 weeks. Andrew