From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2 et.al. release schedule
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 18:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C65D75D.5020900@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C4F228A.4010803@cygnus.com>
> See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
>
> There have been plenty of concerns raised about the unreliability of the GDB release cycle: 12 months, 18 months, ... I'm looking for more robust ways of addressing this. (btw the 5.2 release manager role is still available) (I promise not to break an arm again :-).
(I've had a very welcome expression of interest for the release role).
> In previous e-mail I've mentioned the intention to branch 5.2 mid Feb and release it mid March.
>
> With those two points in mind, and looking across at GCC for idea's, I'd like to propose that GDB have a more formal release schedule.
>
> I should note that GDB 5.1 established a new precident - it was released with several targets (HP/UX, ALPHA) known to be broken. Being willing to do this greatly simplified the task of the release person as they should no longer feel guilty when documenting that certain targets/natives just don't work.
>
> GCC's cycle is every 6 months. GDB could go for 12, 6, 4, or 3 months. In the below I've somewhat arbitrarially chosen 4 months. That would give three major and (possibly) three minor releases a year.
>
> 01 Jan - 5.1.1
> 02 Feb - branch (5.2)
> 03 Mar - release (5.2)
> 04 Apr
> 05 May - 5.2.x?
> 06 Jun - branch (5.3)
> 07 Jul - release (5.3)
> 08 Aug
> 09 Sep - 5.3.x?
> 10 Oct - branch (5.4)
> 11 Nov - release (5.4)
> 12 Dec
No objections (I guess everyone knows it is me that gets to do this).
I've added cronjobs to send out reminders of the branch and release
dates. The branch reminder (branch in two weeks) should appear in about
a week.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-10 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-23 12:52 Andrew Cagney
2002-01-23 16:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-09 18:13 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C65D75D.5020900@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox