From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2584 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 20:49:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2492 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 20:49:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2002 20:49:45 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AF03E77; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:49:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C6439E6.8070007@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:49:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Theodore A. Roth" Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb support for Atmel AVR References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 > :)Finally, there is -Werror. Your target should be buildable with: > :) --target= --enable-gdb-build-warnings=,-Werror > :)and then start. You need to select your host carefully. Pragmatics: > :)anyone making changes across GDB should try rebuilding and running all > :)targets. -Werror makes this much easier. > > That should be easy to do. > > :) > :)The one thing you'll notice isn't on the check list is test results. On > :)that count, far as I'm conceerned, as soon as your target is showing > :)reasonable signs of life it is ready for acceptance. > > Some people are already using it for real work so I think it's got a heart > beat already. ;) Sounds good. > I'm especially interested in someone reviewing the changes I had to make > outside of avr-tdep.c and config/avr/*. These changes may affect other > targets. I've tried really hard to keep those changes to a minimum though. (Mutter something about needing to avoid contamination until the assignment is in place :-/ :-) I'll personally avoid looking at the changes however it looks like you're getting the feedback you need. good luck! Andrew