From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-7699-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16631 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2002 23:30:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16428 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2002 23:30:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 23:30:29 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8C4DA3E57; Tue,  5 Feb 2002 18:30:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3C606B13.9040906@cygnus.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 15:30:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Graeme Peterson <gp@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB MI command "-stack-list-arguments"
References: <200202052233.RAA3387432@node128.ott.qnx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2

> Hi, all.
> 
> I am using GDB-5.0 in MI mode.  According to documentation, the 
> "stack-list-arguments 1" command is supposed to display a list of 
> the arguments for all frames. But it also displays all locals for 
> all frames if the current frame has an argument (non-void).  
> 
> I don't know if it is correct or not but this is very convenient.  
> 
> Could someone please verify what the correct behavior should be for
> "stack-list-arguments"?  Should it return the local variables at all?  
> If so, should it be returning them regardless of whether or not the
> current function had non-void parameters?
> 
> To see the problem debug this:
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> int main( int argc, char* argv[]  )
> {
>     int k = 0;
>     return(0);
> }
> 
> Then replace "int main( int argc, char* argv[]  )" by "int main( void )" and
> try again.
> 
> Thanks.
> Graeme Peterson.


bug :-(

Have a look at the testcase, it doesn't have arguments in the function 
at level 0.  More test cases are needed :-)

Andrew