From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32414 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 23:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32373 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 23:41:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 23:41:01 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.231.12]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA09882; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:40:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3C59D46C.AF35262A@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:41:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: "Sarnath K - CTD, Chennai." , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Thread Support for remote debugging References: <3C59ABC2.B5AA322E@redhat.com> <20020131181217.B4883@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:40:34PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > > "Sarnath K - CTD, Chennai." wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > I have been browsing the mail archives for > > > knowing the current state of thread support > > > while doing remote debugging using GDB. > > > Although a lot of discussions have happened, > > > I am not able to find the current state of work > > > in that area. > > > > By "knowing the current state of thread support", > > do you mean finding out whether the remote target > > supports thread debugging? > > No, he means "knowing whether GDB and GDB Server support doing remote > debugging at all", as far as I can tell. Yeah, but gdb always supports doing remote thread debugging, so the question comes down to whether gdbserver (ie. the remote target, as I said) supports thread debugging. > We've covered this ground a couple times lately :) Someone promised to > contribute thread support and dropped off the face of the earth. It's > on my TODO list, but I don't anticipate getting to it any time soon. I trust you mean in gdbserver. The support for remote threads is already in gdb.