From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3111 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 23:00:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2993 invoked by uid 22784); 31 Jan 2002 23:00:14 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Newsgroups: cygnus.gdb Subject: Re: Profiling gdb? Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:00:00 -0000 Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-ID: <3C59C8C0.1F2938E0@redhat.com> References: <20020120210343.A22638@nevyn.them.org> <3C4B8A6B.30407@cygnus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: cronkite.cygnus.com 1012517461 10592 205.180.231.12 (31 Jan 2002 22:51:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: postmaster@cygnus.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Jan 2002 22:51:01 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en To: gdb@sources.redhat.com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup cygnus.gdb X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > What was the final status of the profiling patch? It's a feature I'd > > really like to see in (having it in means fewer local changes in my > > tree when I'm testing the speed of something!). > > Interesting timing, I was just looking over the same thing. Me too -- it would have been really handy for Ubicom.