From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25507 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2002 03:38:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25449 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 03:38:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.pair.com) (209.68.1.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 03:38:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 93854 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 03:38:39 -0000 Received: from we-24-126-75-99.we.mediaone.net (HELO kegel.com) (24.126.75.99) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 03:38:39 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 24.126.75.99 Message-ID: <3C576C11.FFE78FE1@kegel.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:38:00 -0000 From: Dan Kegel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: How does one cross-compile gdbserver? References: <3C574C25.8A2F007@kegel.com> <20020129205052.B19879@nevyn.them.org> <3C575A1C.5020700@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00345.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:28:05PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > > > >> I'm going crazy trying to build gdb 5.1.1's gdbserver > >> in a cross-development environment. > > > > I don't give it good odds of compiling. I've tried several times to > > clean that up and gotten stymied in various people's objections to my > > methods (sorry Andrew). I'll be taking another stab at it this week I > > think. > > :-) > > I've been thinking about making it obsolete. Not that I want to lose > it. Rather that it clears the slate and removes any obligation to keep > other targets working. If you make gdbserver obsolete, what would you replace it with? There's no question that some sort of remote debugging probe is a must for embedded development (personally, I use printf, but 90% of developers would much prefer to use a debugger). - Dan