From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28982 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2002 19:57:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28950 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 19:57:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 19:57:49 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A8E3C81; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:57:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C4F15BB.2030801@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:57:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sarrazip@sympatico.ca Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Spamguarding email addresses in GDB bug reports References: <20020122191655.A14896@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2 > I have just submitted a GDB bug report (#288) and noticed that > my email address is published in it without being "spamguarded" > (as in , for example). > > I hope this can be fixed. Thanks. I've passed your suggestion on. One immediate observation was that your e-mail address is only visible via a cgi-script and it was thought that harvester robots would normally avoid them. Hence the problem may be less serious then it might at first appear. If you're interested in having a go at changing the script your self, I can point you at the relevant sources. enjoy, Andrew