From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-7392-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 471 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2002 22:39:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 427 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 22:39:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 22:39:10 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B17443D48; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:39:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3C47528D.8090201@cygnus.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:39:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com,
	Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?
References: <3C3CBCB8.90401@redhat.com> <3C43B0FF.9000506@cygnus.com> <3C473989.4090601@cygnus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2

> For lack of opinion other than Daniel (thanks for the comments).  I'm going to:


Sorry.  An apology to Michael Chastain is in order.

Michael has gone through the 5.1 branch and confirmed it is far from 
regressing.  A 5.1.1 will definitly be more useable than 5.1.

http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2002-01-14/index.html

Andrew