From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27785 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2002 04:22:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27708 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2002 04:22:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2002 04:22:43 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB203E8F; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 23:22:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C352E10.4030009@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 20:22:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011207 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: debashis mahata Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni Subject: Re: Double ';' problem in stabs References: <001601c18f83$e123ebc0$73b17fc0@8420044-mahatad.wipro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 > Questions: > 1. Is it anywhere documented that the last ';' (the second one) should > be present? > 2. If not, is it a bug (the assumption that last ';' should > be persent) in Gdb, which requires a fix? > 3. In case a fix is required what will be the long term strategy? I'd treat it as a GDB bug - even if someone could find a spec indicating that Sun's compiler is producing bad STABS, GDB should still be handling them. Could I suggest at least filing a bug report at http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/ enjoy, Andrew