From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12737 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2001 02:35:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12692 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 02:35:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 02:35:50 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F493D5E; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:35:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C0ED984.3000706@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:35:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20011020 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Shebs Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Is somsolib.c still in use? References: <1011206012408.ZM6341@ocotillo.lan> <3C0ECBD2.EECD3394@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 > Kevin Buettner wrote: > >> >> The subject line says it all; does anyone know if somsolib.c is still used >> by any port? >> >> I've done my own checking and expected somsolib.o to show up on a >> NATDEPFILES line in a *.mh file, but couldn't find one. > > > Did you whack your config/pa subdir or something? It's mentioned > in nearly every .mh file there. Good thing too, because it's > supposed to be how you get solib support on HP systems. Don't tempt me .... I take it you're trying to clean-up the shlib stuff. Nice. If I were you I'd be seriously considering a somewhat ruthless strategy such as dump everything this stuff depends on into that file. That way you are insulated from that targets inner workings. Andrew