From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22787 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2001 07:15:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22741 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2001 07:15:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2001 07:15:16 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAD23DC2 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 02:15:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C048F04.10203@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 03:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20011020 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.1 ERRATA file? References: <3C033A28.50209@cygnus.com> <20011127070345.A43139@oolong.il.thewrittenword.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:41:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> > >> > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know >> > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file >> > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file >> > gdb/ERRATA? > >> >> I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS. > > > Emacs has PROBLEMS. Hmm, while I prefer ERRATA, I'm never one to pass up an oportunity that lets me use EMACS as the rationale for a decision. -> PROBLEMS (ulgh). Again? I think BUGS would be confusing. A problem might be caused by several bugs -> HP/UX. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.1 ERRATA file? Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3C048F04.10203@cygnus.com> References: <3C033A28.50209@cygnus.com> <20011127070345.A43139@oolong.il.thewrittenword.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00300.html Message-ID: <20011127231500.37dX27QuPBqmgZr6EPwJVFrUEBj-CtL9--vjKPIg9YU@z> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:41:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> > >> > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know >> > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file >> > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file >> > gdb/ERRATA? > >> >> I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS. > > > Emacs has PROBLEMS. Hmm, while I prefer ERRATA, I'm never one to pass up an oportunity that lets me use EMACS as the rationale for a decision. -> PROBLEMS (ulgh). Again? I think BUGS would be confusing. A problem might be caused by several bugs -> HP/UX. Andrew