From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21517 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2001 08:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21422 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 08:45:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (24.114.42.213) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 08:45:55 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E043DC1; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 03:45:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C0352B7.10607@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:54:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20011020 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: 5.1.1? Was: 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> I've bumped the 5.1 branch version.in again. This will (hopefully) kick >> start the branches snapshot process. > > > Are we going to release v5.1.1? I don't know. I'll let the 5.1 snapshot machinery chug along for a while regardless. If a few extra platforms get fixed and pushed onto the 5.1-branch then a 5.1.1 is probably worth it. If nothing else, it would provide a little closure. A few C++ tweeks might also be useful (although I suspect more difficult to select / merge). At a guess 5.2 would branch Feb - Mar '02 (i.e. late summer :-) Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: 5.1.1? Was: 5.1 -> 5.1.0_0000-00-00-cvs Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3C0352B7.10607@cygnus.com> References: X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00280.html Message-ID: <20011127004600.4Gs-Mkli3HiE2lKFtDG5chydYJeefP80FpREOJnMEj0@z> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> I've bumped the 5.1 branch version.in again. This will (hopefully) kick >> start the branches snapshot process. > > > Are we going to release v5.1.1? I don't know. I'll let the 5.1 snapshot machinery chug along for a while regardless. If a few extra platforms get fixed and pushed onto the 5.1-branch then a 5.1.1 is probably worth it. If nothing else, it would provide a little closure. A few C++ tweeks might also be useful (although I suspect more difficult to select / merge). At a guess 5.2 would branch Feb - Mar '02 (i.e. late summer :-) Andrew