From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: jimb@cygnus.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB's texi to html conversion; Was: [Jim Blandy ] RFA: Don't pass -glossary flag to texi2html Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:25:00 -0000 Message-id: <3BD0B666.8070207@cygnus.com> References: <3405-Fri12Oct2001001736+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3BC61DEC.1080902@cygnus.com> <5567-Fri12Oct2001083936+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3BC71C63.8010401@cygnus.com> <968-Fri12Oct2001192329+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00204.html >> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:37:55 -0400 >> From: Andrew Cagney >> >> I do have reservations over using a non-released version of makeinfo. > > > Obviously, it's your call. IMHO the generation of HTML is not > terribly important because I expect it to be used almost exclusively > for the GDB Web page. It's not really a user-level feature, it's a > maintainer's feature. If that's true, using a non-released version > shouldn't harm anyone but you [;-)] When it comes down to it, I probably shouldn't care - the most important thing is good web pages. Where can I get this magic texinfo? Andrew