From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>, gdb@sources.redhat.com, Mark Kettenis <kettenis@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] fix  cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:50:00 -0000
Message-id: <3BC5085E.7A398D76@apple.com>
References: <3.0.6.32.20011004012430.010f56b0"@idefix.wisa.be> <4.2.0.58.20011005095752.00d0db60@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20011010221023.B13834@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00106.html

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:00:09PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >Could someone, (Christopher ?) explains us why tm-cygwin.h includes
> >tm-i386v.h when as Mark Kettenis said, Cygwin is not derived from
> >System V ?
> 
> I am sorry but I really can't explain why tm-cygwin.h includes
> tm-i386v.h.  I believe that predates my maintainership.

Probably because Windows uses COFF, as does SVR3, so in a very loose
sense, Cygwin does have an ancestral relationship with SVR3.
Ironically, it doesn't look like there are any actual vestiges of
COFFness left in tm-i386v.h

Stan