From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Fernando Nasser Cc: Mickael Gicquaire , "gdb@sources.redhat.com" Subject: Re: gdb/mi and signals vs gdb/cli Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 08:26:00 -0000 Message-id: <3BB88B2E.2030203@cygnus.com> References: <1010928114759.ZM22692@bristol.st.com> <3BB50C41.10807@cygnus.com> <3BB87F6A.F4C2DE5A@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00005.html > > Andrew, > > I am afraid we may be missing a ui_out_flush() at the end of all > of the switch clauses in infrun.c I think that sounds wrong. I don't think infrun.c needs to know if/when the output needs to be flushed. Remember, we're trying to separate the stop output from its analysis. (I'll ignore those print_stop_reason() calls). BTW, there were some fixed problems with missing top level flushes and a missing stop reason case. Check the changelogs. 28/6 is getting pretty old for a snap, can I suggest trying something more recent. enjoy, Andrew PS: Since the snaps are comming from the 5.1 branch you'll need to use CVS to get current sources.