From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:42:00 -0000
Message-id: <3B83E101.2050607@cygnus.com>
References: <3B80A6EF.7040108@cygnus.com> <3B828253.7040700@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00181.html

>     o    [download|cvs] or [download] [cvs] from ChrisF.
>         Ok with me.  Any one got a preference?
>         Should there be separate gdb/download and
>         gdb/cvs directories? Probably not.  Hmm, then again
>         it would allow a better separation of CVS(1)
>         and official FTP.

I added [cvs] pointing to download.  I almost created a ``cvs'' 
directory but then rememberd DOS.

I've also tweeked the fish so it points to the relevant news article so 
people can learn a little about its history.

CGD wrote:
> I don't know what the exact protocol is for announcing minor changes,
> so i'll just note that I fixed the 'download' link in the 5.1
> announcement.  (it was pointing into the void.)

I've no idea.  I know JimK made a decision that there was no ChangeLog. 
  Perhaps mention tweeks you think important.  Looking around, there are 
plenty of other "/.." links around :-(

Thanks for fixing it.
	Andrew